New forum section proposal

[Leningrad Union]

I suggest that we add a section discussing World Assembly proposals, drafts and resolutions.

[Chancellor Campbell II]

Interesting idea. There are then two questions that need to be answered:
One: If a (sub)forum were created, would it be used?
Two: Perhaps more importantly, what would such a forum be called? Obviously it needs to stick with our theme naming conventions.

[Leningrad Union]

Interesting idea. There are then two questions that need to be answered:
One: If a (sub)forum were created, would it be used?
Two: Perhaps more importantly, what would such a forum be called? Obviously it needs to stick with our theme naming conventions.

1: I'm not sure, but it's worth trying.
2: That's a tough one. Maybe something to do with an airport or embassy to show the theme of international politics.

[Chancellor Campbell II]

Okay, so if this was going to slot in under something else, do you think it would go better under the Palace of Beijing (main government section) or the Embassy of Busan (foreign affairs)?

[Leningrad Union]

Palace of Beijing, but I think there should be a poll that decides it.

[Llamas]

Just make the decision yourself, a poll will take too long. And we need to actually do it, please, not just talk.

[Chancellor Campbell II]

Alright, I think there are two new sub forums from which we could benefit, first a WA auditorium as mentioned, second a separate, more official sub forum within the Palace of Beijing to contain actual resolutions and such separate from the sporratic discussions and announcements on regional matters that have congregated in the Palace of Beijing. Since there is a general consensus, I will work on setting them up.

Just make the decision yourself, a poll will take too long. And we need to actually do it, please, not just talk.

But talk is so much cheaper! Action requires effort. 

[Sponsored content]